Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Oppression and mismanagement - reduction in shareholding - illegal transfer and allotment of shares - The NCLAT observed that, the appellants did not fully comply with the NCLAT’s order dated 16.04.2019, specifically regarding the rectification of the register of members to reflect the shareholding status as of 19.05.2010. The fresh transfer of shares on 28.11.2017 was invalidated, as it was an attempt to circumvent the Tribunal’s previous orders. The appellants were found to have engaged in acts of oppression and mismanagement, justifying the respondents’ claims. The appellants did not properly offer proportionate shares from additional allotments to the respondents, violating the Tribunal’s directives. - The Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) upheld the NCLT’s findings that the appellants engaged in improper share transfers and failed to comply with the Tribunal’s orders.
Oppression and mismanagement - reduction in shareholding - illegal transfer and allotment of shares - The NCLAT observed that, the appellants did not fully comply with the NCLAT’s order dated 16.04.2019, specifically regarding the rectification of the register of members to reflect the shareholding status as of 19.05.2010. The fresh transfer of shares on 28.11.2017 was invalidated, as it was an attempt to circumvent the Tribunal’s previous orders. The appellants were found to have engaged in acts of oppression and mismanagement, justifying the respondents’ claims. The appellants did not properly offer proportionate shares from additional allotments to the respondents, violating the Tribunal’s directives. - The Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) upheld the NCLT’s findings that the appellants engaged in improper share transfers and failed to comply with the Tribunal’s orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.