Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
LTCG - deduction u/s 54 new residential premises - Relevance of date of possession or date of agreement - Regarding the determination of the date of acquisition for the new property, the Tribunal emphasized that the essence of the transaction should be considered. It noted that the appellants had acquired the right to purchase the property through an agreement while it was still under construction. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the date of possession, when the property became inhabitable, should be considered as the date of acquisition.
LTCG - deduction u/s 54 new residential premises - Relevance of date of possession or date of agreement - Regarding the determination of the date of acquisition for the new property, the Tribunal emphasized that the essence of the transaction should be considered. It noted that the appellants had acquired the right to purchase the property through an agreement while it was still under construction. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the date of possession, when the property became inhabitable, should be considered as the date of acquisition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.