Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Restoration of securities held by the appellant which were allegedly illegally sold by the respondent-firm - The Supreme Court adjudicated a complex arbitration dispute concerning unauthorized sale of securities. The case traversed multiple judicial forums, including arbitral tribunals, district courts, and high courts. The pivotal issues involved unauthorized sale, interest on awarded sums, and compensation for the petitioner. The Supreme Court, exercising its extraordinary jurisdiction, directed the respondent to pay the awarded amount of ₹21,70,143 with 12% simple interest per annum from 27th September 2013. This decision aimed to conclude the protracted litigation fairly, ensuring justice for the elderly petitioner.
Restoration of securities held by the appellant which were allegedly illegally sold by the respondent-firm - The Supreme Court adjudicated a complex arbitration dispute concerning unauthorized sale of securities. The case traversed multiple judicial forums, including arbitral tribunals, district courts, and high courts. The pivotal issues involved unauthorized sale, interest on awarded sums, and compensation for the petitioner. The Supreme Court, exercising its extraordinary jurisdiction, directed the respondent to pay the awarded amount of ₹21,70,143 with 12% simple interest per annum from 27th September 2013. This decision aimed to conclude the protracted litigation fairly, ensuring justice for the elderly petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.