Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Validity of Faceless assessment of income escaping assessment u/s 151 - According to Petitioners, the notice could have been issued only by the Faceless Assessing Officer (“FAO”) not issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (“JAO”) - The court acknowledged that the issues in the present petitions were covered by the Hexaware Technologies judgment and consequently quashed the impugned notices. Any reassessment orders, demand notices, or penalties based on these invalid notices were also set aside. The court extended this benefit to petitioners who had raised the issue of notice validity orally and disposed of the petitions and any pending interim applications accordingly.
Validity of Faceless assessment of income escaping assessment u/s 151 - According to Petitioners, the notice could have been issued only by the Faceless Assessing Officer (“FAO”) not issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (“JAO”) - The court acknowledged that the issues in the present petitions were covered by the Hexaware Technologies judgment and consequently quashed the impugned notices. Any reassessment orders, demand notices, or penalties based on these invalid notices were also set aside. The court extended this benefit to petitioners who had raised the issue of notice validity orally and disposed of the petitions and any pending interim applications accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.