Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
Addition u/s 68 - burden of proof - share application money - The High Court, upon reviewing the submissions and evidence, concurred with the ITAT's findings. It emphasized that the Assessee had met the burden of proof required under Section 68, differentiating the case from previous judgments like CIT vs. Sadiq Shaikh. The High Court upheld the ITAT's decision, concluding that the Assessee had satisfactorily demonstrated the nature of the transaction with sufficient documentary evidence.
Addition u/s 68 - burden of proof - share application money - The High Court, upon reviewing the submissions and evidence, concurred with the ITAT's findings. It emphasized that the Assessee had met the burden of proof required under Section 68, differentiating the case from previous judgments like CIT vs. Sadiq Shaikh. The High Court upheld the ITAT's decision, concluding that the Assessee had satisfactorily demonstrated the nature of the transaction with sufficient documentary evidence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
