Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Maintainability of section 7 application - Initiation of CIRP - existence of debt and default - date of default - On 14.02.2020 the account was declared NPA - The Appellate Tribunal emphasized that the date of default, being the date of declaration of the account as NPA, was valid for initiating insolvency proceedings under Section 7. The Tribunal ruled that the default date should be considered as the date of declaration of the account as NPA, rather than the date of renewal of the working capital limit. It clarified that the renewal of the limit did not affect the occurrence of default by the Corporate Debtor in fulfilling its financial obligations.
Maintainability of section 7 application - Initiation of CIRP - existence of debt and default - date of default - On 14.02.2020 the account was declared NPA - The Appellate Tribunal emphasized that the date of default, being the date of declaration of the account as NPA, was valid for initiating insolvency proceedings under Section 7. The Tribunal ruled that the default date should be considered as the date of declaration of the account as NPA, rather than the date of renewal of the working capital limit. It clarified that the renewal of the limit did not affect the occurrence of default by the Corporate Debtor in fulfilling its financial obligations.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.