Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Rejection of prayer of Operational Creditor to initiate the CIRP against the Corporate Debtor - The Appellate tribunal (NCLAT) found no breach of the contract terms by the respondent as the initial agreed terms were for the appellant to pick up the goods from the respondent's location. It was determined that the appellant attempted to shift the terms in the appellate documents, which were not presented at the Adjudicating Authority. The tribunal concluded that there was a pre-existing dispute regarding the delivery and payment terms, substantiated by the evidence of email exchanges and the non-collection of goods. - The tribunal upheld the decision of the Adjudicating Authority
Rejection of prayer of Operational Creditor to initiate the CIRP against the Corporate Debtor - The Appellate tribunal (NCLAT) found no breach of the contract terms by the respondent as the initial agreed terms were for the appellant to pick up the goods from the respondent's location. It was determined that the appellant attempted to shift the terms in the appellate documents, which were not presented at the Adjudicating Authority. The tribunal concluded that there was a pre-existing dispute regarding the delivery and payment terms, substantiated by the evidence of email exchanges and the non-collection of goods. - The tribunal upheld the decision of the Adjudicating Authority
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
