Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Dishonour of Cheque - conviction of accused - The High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act based on the evidence presented, finding the accused guilty of dishonoring the cheques issued to discharge his financial liability. Regarding the defense of non-payment, the High Court found it unconvincing as the accused failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his claim, and the complainant's version was more credible. The High Court affirmed the lower court's judgment, stating that the evidence presented was considered in accordance with the law, and there was no reason to interfere with the conviction.
Dishonour of Cheque - conviction of accused - The High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act based on the evidence presented, finding the accused guilty of dishonoring the cheques issued to discharge his financial liability. Regarding the defense of non-payment, the High Court found it unconvincing as the accused failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his claim, and the complainant's version was more credible. The High Court affirmed the lower court's judgment, stating that the evidence presented was considered in accordance with the law, and there was no reason to interfere with the conviction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
