Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Levy of penalty - Compliance with the E-Way bill as required under the provisions of the CGST/UPGST Act and related rule or not - presumption of tax evasion in its absence - The High Court scrutinized the timing of E-Way Bill download and interception, concluding that the E-Way Bill was indeed downloaded before the interception, indicating compliance with the law. The Court noted that the E-Way Bill and invoice matched the goods, suggesting no intent to evade tax. - The Court observed that the penalty order was passed on the same day as the show cause notice, denying the petitioner an opportunity to respond, thus violating principles of natural justice. In light of these findings, the High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the penalty orders and directing the refund of the tax and penalty amounts deposited by the petitioner.
Levy of penalty - Compliance with the E-Way bill as required under the provisions of the CGST/UPGST Act and related rule or not - presumption of tax evasion in its absence - The High Court scrutinized the timing of E-Way Bill download and interception, concluding that the E-Way Bill was indeed downloaded before the interception, indicating compliance with the law. The Court noted that the E-Way Bill and invoice matched the goods, suggesting no intent to evade tax. - The Court observed that the penalty order was passed on the same day as the show cause notice, denying the petitioner an opportunity to respond, thus violating principles of natural justice. In light of these findings, the High Court allowed the writ petition, quashing the penalty orders and directing the refund of the tax and penalty amounts deposited by the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.