Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - The High Court found that the Assessing Officer's reliance on cumulative figures provided by CBIC, without specifying the individual import entries or bills, was insufficient to justify the addition of unexplained expenditure. Moreover, the lack of specific details hindered the petitioner's ability to reconcile the data and refute the allegation adequately. Therefore, the Court concluded that the assessment order was unsustainable due to the absence of material evidence supporting the addition.
Unexplained expenditure u/s 69C - The High Court found that the Assessing Officer's reliance on cumulative figures provided by CBIC, without specifying the individual import entries or bills, was insufficient to justify the addition of unexplained expenditure. Moreover, the lack of specific details hindered the petitioner's ability to reconcile the data and refute the allegation adequately. Therefore, the Court concluded that the assessment order was unsustainable due to the absence of material evidence supporting the addition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.