Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
TP Adjustment - The Appellate Tribunal considered the amendment made to the section, which specified domestic transactions exceeding a certain threshold. The Tribunal noted that the transactions in question were not international transactions and did not fall under the ambit of Section 92BA. Consequently, it deemed the upward adjustments made by the Assessing Officer invalid. - Delving into the effect of the omission of Section 92BA from the statute, the Tribunal cited legal principles indicating that when a provision is repealed, it should be considered as if it never existed. Therefore, the Tribunal reasoned that the decision made by the Assessing Officer based on Section 92BA was without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed.
TP Adjustment - The Appellate Tribunal considered the amendment made to the section, which specified domestic transactions exceeding a certain threshold. The Tribunal noted that the transactions in question were not international transactions and did not fall under the ambit of Section 92BA. Consequently, it deemed the upward adjustments made by the Assessing Officer invalid. - Delving into the effect of the omission of Section 92BA from the statute, the Tribunal cited legal principles indicating that when a provision is repealed, it should be considered as if it never existed. Therefore, the Tribunal reasoned that the decision made by the Assessing Officer based on Section 92BA was without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.