Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
TP Adjustment - The Appellate Tribunal considered the amendment made to the section, which specified domestic transactions exceeding a certain threshold. The Tribunal noted that the transactions in question were not international transactions and did not fall under the ambit of Section 92BA. Consequently, it deemed the upward adjustments made by the Assessing Officer invalid. - Delving into the effect of the omission of Section 92BA from the statute, the Tribunal cited legal principles indicating that when a provision is repealed, it should be considered as if it never existed. Therefore, the Tribunal reasoned that the decision made by the Assessing Officer based on Section 92BA was without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed.
TP Adjustment - The Appellate Tribunal considered the amendment made to the section, which specified domestic transactions exceeding a certain threshold. The Tribunal noted that the transactions in question were not international transactions and did not fall under the ambit of Section 92BA. Consequently, it deemed the upward adjustments made by the Assessing Officer invalid. - Delving into the effect of the omission of Section 92BA from the statute, the Tribunal cited legal principles indicating that when a provision is repealed, it should be considered as if it never existed. Therefore, the Tribunal reasoned that the decision made by the Assessing Officer based on Section 92BA was without jurisdiction and liable to be quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
