Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Dishonour of Cheque - liability created in favour of the Complainant by the Accused or not - MoU between the manufacturer and the retailer - The retailer issued multiple cheques to the distributor, which were subsequently dishonoured - The High Court concluded that the trial court had erred in its judgement, primarily by misinterpreting the evidence and the legal standards applicable under the NI Act. The appeals by the distributor were allowed, and the retailer was directed to pay double the amount of the dishonoured cheques as a fine, underlining the enforcement of commercial responsibilities and the legal implications of issuing cheques without sufficient funds.
Dishonour of Cheque - liability created in favour of the Complainant by the Accused or not - MoU between the manufacturer and the retailer - The retailer issued multiple cheques to the distributor, which were subsequently dishonoured - The High Court concluded that the trial court had erred in its judgement, primarily by misinterpreting the evidence and the legal standards applicable under the NI Act. The appeals by the distributor were allowed, and the retailer was directed to pay double the amount of the dishonoured cheques as a fine, underlining the enforcement of commercial responsibilities and the legal implications of issuing cheques without sufficient funds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
