Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) - Threshold limit of Rs. 1 Crore - The Appellate Tribunal found that the appellant's gross receipts, when considering certain fee receipts from the previous financial year separately, did not exceed the threshold limit of Rs. 1 crore. Citing a precedent and interpreting the relevant provisions, the Tribunal held that each educational institution operated by the appellant should be treated as a separate entity for the purpose of determining eligibility for exemption. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant was entitled to exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act.
Exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiad) - Threshold limit of Rs. 1 Crore - The Appellate Tribunal found that the appellant's gross receipts, when considering certain fee receipts from the previous financial year separately, did not exceed the threshold limit of Rs. 1 crore. Citing a precedent and interpreting the relevant provisions, the Tribunal held that each educational institution operated by the appellant should be treated as a separate entity for the purpose of determining eligibility for exemption. Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that the appellant was entitled to exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad) of the Act.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.