Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
100% EOUs - delay in fulfilment of export obligations - Customs Warehousing Licence for warehousing, manufacturing and export of software - Upon review, the Tribunal found that the appellant applied for an extension, which was ultimately granted by the Development Commissioner with retrospective effect, providing an additional five years to fulfill export obligations starting from May 2008. Critically, the Tribunal concluded that the impugned order was premature, as it was passed before the final decision on the extension request. Given the retrospective approval, the demands raised in the order were deemed unsustainable.
100% EOUs - delay in fulfilment of export obligations - Customs Warehousing Licence for warehousing, manufacturing and export of software - Upon review, the Tribunal found that the appellant applied for an extension, which was ultimately granted by the Development Commissioner with retrospective effect, providing an additional five years to fulfill export obligations starting from May 2008. Critically, the Tribunal concluded that the impugned order was premature, as it was passed before the final decision on the extension request. Given the retrospective approval, the demands raised in the order were deemed unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.