Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Claim of appellant rejected on the ground that Resolution Plan has been approved by the CoC - right to claim consideration of claim again in third round - NOIDA’s status and claims - The Appellate Tribunal found that with the Resolution Plan's resubmission, previously rejected claims should be considered anew, especially since they are no longer barred by an approved plan. - NCLAT issued the directions as: The Adjudicating Authority must dispose of pending applications before the resubmission of the Resolution Plan. The SRA must incorporate any directions resulting from these applications into the revised plan. The CoC is to reconsider the revised plan only after these inclusions.
Claim of appellant rejected on the ground that Resolution Plan has been approved by the CoC - right to claim consideration of claim again in third round - NOIDA’s status and claims - The Appellate Tribunal found that with the Resolution Plan's resubmission, previously rejected claims should be considered anew, especially since they are no longer barred by an approved plan. - NCLAT issued the directions as: The Adjudicating Authority must dispose of pending applications before the resubmission of the Resolution Plan. The SRA must incorporate any directions resulting from these applications into the revised plan. The CoC is to reconsider the revised plan only after these inclusions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.