Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
CIRP - Admissibility of Section 95 Applications against Personal Guarantors - discharge the liabilities of Personal Guarantors on approval of Resolution Plan - The Appellate Tribunal noted that the approval of a Resolution Plan does not automatically discharge the liabilities of personal guarantors, as established by the Supreme Court's judgment in Lalit Kumar Jain. - The Tribunal emphasized that even after the approval of a Resolution Plan, recourse against third parties, including personal guarantors, can still be pursued by Financial Creditors. - Regarding the effect of the Resolution Plan on personal guarantees, the Tribunal observed that the plan explicitly excluded guarantees from assignment and allowed the Financial Creditor to retain them. Therefore, the Adjudicating Authority rightly admitted the Section 95 Applications based on the provisions of the Resolution Plan.
CIRP - Admissibility of Section 95 Applications against Personal Guarantors - discharge the liabilities of Personal Guarantors on approval of Resolution Plan - The Appellate Tribunal noted that the approval of a Resolution Plan does not automatically discharge the liabilities of personal guarantors, as established by the Supreme Court's judgment in Lalit Kumar Jain. - The Tribunal emphasized that even after the approval of a Resolution Plan, recourse against third parties, including personal guarantors, can still be pursued by Financial Creditors. - Regarding the effect of the Resolution Plan on personal guarantees, the Tribunal observed that the plan explicitly excluded guarantees from assignment and allowed the Financial Creditor to retain them. Therefore, the Adjudicating Authority rightly admitted the Section 95 Applications based on the provisions of the Resolution Plan.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
