Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Valuation - C&F agent service - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - charges collected for activities like loading, unloading, etc are includable in the assessable value or not - The Appellate Tribunal held that the charges received by the appellant, including reimbursable expenses, were part of the C&F agent service and thus subject to service tax. - The Tribunal observed that the expenses reimbursed to the appellant were not on an actual basis but were fixed on a lump sum per month. Therefore, it was held that these expenses were towards rendering C&F services and should be included in the assessable value for service tax purposes.
Valuation - C&F agent service - inclusion of reimbursement of expenses - charges collected for activities like loading, unloading, etc are includable in the assessable value or not - The Appellate Tribunal held that the charges received by the appellant, including reimbursable expenses, were part of the C&F agent service and thus subject to service tax. - The Tribunal observed that the expenses reimbursed to the appellant were not on an actual basis but were fixed on a lump sum per month. Therefore, it was held that these expenses were towards rendering C&F services and should be included in the assessable value for service tax purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.