Belated Form 10B filing during Covid-19 cannot defeat charitable exemption where genuine hardship warrants condonation and substantial justice prevail...
Limitation for consequential assessments runs from prescribed authority receipt, while verified purchases cannot be disallowed merely for unanswered s...
Higher depreciation for qualifying commercial vehicles, exempt-income disallowance, research deduction verification, and club-expense treatment clarif...
Charitable registration renewal cannot become an assessment of receipts, profitability or annual exemption compliance, requiring renewal and donation ...
AMP expenditure for own business is not an international transaction without an associated-enterprise arrangement, eliminating transfer pricing adjust...
Provisional attachment of bank account - Expiry of one year from the date of the order of attachment - The court noted that despite the statutory provision clearly specifying the expiry of provisional attachment after one year, such errors by revenue authorities in allowing attachments to continue beyond the prescribed period were becoming common. The court highlighted the unnecessary burden placed on petitioners who are compelled to approach the court for relief due to the revenue authorities' failure to adhere to statutory timelines. - Consequently, the High court directed the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs to take corrective and necessary action to prevent similar errors in the future. Additionally, recognizing the similarity of issues under both the Central Act and the State Act, the court directed the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State to communicate the order to the Commissioner, Commercial Tax, for notice and remedial action.
Provisional attachment of bank account - Expiry of one year from the date of the order of attachment - The court noted that despite the statutory provision clearly specifying the expiry of provisional attachment after one year, such errors by revenue authorities in allowing attachments to continue beyond the prescribed period were becoming common. The court highlighted the unnecessary burden placed on petitioners who are compelled to approach the court for relief due to the revenue authorities' failure to adhere to statutory timelines. - Consequently, the High court directed the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs to take corrective and necessary action to prevent similar errors in the future. Additionally, recognizing the similarity of issues under both the Central Act and the State Act, the court directed the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State to communicate the order to the Commissioner, Commercial Tax, for notice and remedial action.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
