Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
441 to 460 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Set-off of losses against income from other sources u/s 70 - Applicability of provision of section 10B - petitioner had the status of EOU for a period of 5 years - The High Court upheld the petitioner's contention that Section 10B was not applicable to them as they were a 100% EOU. - The Court, after considering submissions and legal precedents, ruled in favor of the petitioner, declaring the notices and orders as invalid. The Court affirmed the petitioner's right to set off losses under Section 70 and upheld their interpretation of the law.
Set-off of losses against income from other sources u/s 70 - Applicability of provision of section 10B - petitioner had the status of EOU for a period of 5 years - The High Court upheld the petitioner's contention that Section 10B was not applicable to them as they were a 100% EOU. - The Court, after considering submissions and legal precedents, ruled in favor of the petitioner, declaring the notices and orders as invalid. The Court affirmed the petitioner's right to set off losses under Section 70 and upheld their interpretation of the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
