Toy balloon tariff classification: functional heading prevails over residual rubber and festive article headings, supporting penalties for deliberate ...
Customs valuation using comparable contemporaneous imports can displace declared value, while missing speaking orders require pursuit before competent...
Foreign customs declarations and importer admissions established undervaluation, supporting sequential value redetermination, differential duty, and m...
Customs seizure safeguards prevent detention-based limitation avoidance and invalidate provisional release conditions for imported vehicles under an i...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rejection of the application for final approval u/s. 80G on technical grounds - Period of limitation - The Tribunal examined various precedents and CBDT circulars to determine the applicability of the extended timeline to the appellant's case. It noted that the circulars extended the due date for filing Form No. 10AB for registration under Section 12A of the Act to September 30, 2023. The Tribunal reasoned that since the appellant filed its application within the extended timeline, the rejection by the Commissioner was unwarranted. - Additionally, the Tribunal referred to decisions by other benches and observed that the timeline prescribed under clause (iii) of the first proviso to Section 80G(5) should be treated as directory, not mandatory. It emphasized that procedural provisions should serve the cause of justice and not hinder it.
Rejection of the application for final approval u/s. 80G on technical grounds - Period of limitation - The Tribunal examined various precedents and CBDT circulars to determine the applicability of the extended timeline to the appellant's case. It noted that the circulars extended the due date for filing Form No. 10AB for registration under Section 12A of the Act to September 30, 2023. The Tribunal reasoned that since the appellant filed its application within the extended timeline, the rejection by the Commissioner was unwarranted. - Additionally, the Tribunal referred to decisions by other benches and observed that the timeline prescribed under clause (iii) of the first proviso to Section 80G(5) should be treated as directory, not mandatory. It emphasized that procedural provisions should serve the cause of justice and not hinder it.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
