Educational approval requires mandatory State registration, but incidental surplus and trustee-owned land do not prove private benefit or profit motiv...
Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
421 to 440 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of service tax - Employees were deputed to the assessee - receiving services from the overseas company FFECJ through Dispatch Agreement and Secondment Agreement in deployment of qualified and skilled employees during the said period - The Tribunal noted that the employees deputed to the respondent were under its control and direction, with no employer-employee relationship maintained with the overseas company during the assignment period. They upheld the Revenue’s contention regarding the taxability of the services. However, they ruled against the validity of invoking the extended period of limitation, finding no substantial evidence of suppression of facts by the respondent.
Levy of service tax - Employees were deputed to the assessee - receiving services from the overseas company FFECJ through Dispatch Agreement and Secondment Agreement in deployment of qualified and skilled employees during the said period - The Tribunal noted that the employees deputed to the respondent were under its control and direction, with no employer-employee relationship maintained with the overseas company during the assignment period. They upheld the Revenue’s contention regarding the taxability of the services. However, they ruled against the validity of invoking the extended period of limitation, finding no substantial evidence of suppression of facts by the respondent.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.