Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Bonafide purchasers - Auction sale held in favour of appellant - sale challenged on the ground that the Bank had not followed the statutory procedure prescribed under the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 - Issuance and service of mandatory notices to the borrower as required under Rules 8(6) and 8(7). - Despite being bonafide purchasers for value, the court upholds the decision to set aside the sale due to the bank's non-compliance with statutory provisions. The status of the appellants as tenants is restored, allowing the borrower to evict them in accordance with the law.
Bonafide purchasers - Auction sale held in favour of appellant - sale challenged on the ground that the Bank had not followed the statutory procedure prescribed under the Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 - Issuance and service of mandatory notices to the borrower as required under Rules 8(6) and 8(7). - Despite being bonafide purchasers for value, the court upholds the decision to set aside the sale due to the bank's non-compliance with statutory provisions. The status of the appellants as tenants is restored, allowing the borrower to evict them in accordance with the law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.