Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Detention of goods alongwith penalty - Expired e-way Bill - The High Court noted that the goods were indeed covered by a tax invoice and e-way bill, with the expiration of the latter occurring before reaching the consignee. However, it observed that there was no evidence of intentional tax evasion. Considering the circumstances and lack of intent, the court found that the expiration of the e-way bill did not automatically imply tax evasion. - The court concluded that there was no basis for assuming tax evasion solely based on the expiration of the e-way bill. - Consequently, the court set aside the orders of penalty imposition and dismissal of the appeal.
Detention of goods alongwith penalty - Expired e-way Bill - The High Court noted that the goods were indeed covered by a tax invoice and e-way bill, with the expiration of the latter occurring before reaching the consignee. However, it observed that there was no evidence of intentional tax evasion. Considering the circumstances and lack of intent, the court found that the expiration of the e-way bill did not automatically imply tax evasion. - The court concluded that there was no basis for assuming tax evasion solely based on the expiration of the e-way bill. - Consequently, the court set aside the orders of penalty imposition and dismissal of the appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.