Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
461 to 480 of 96332 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of GST on un-denatured Extra Neutral Alcohol supplied by the petitioner - The court observed that the show cause notice called upon the petitioner to submit a written explanation within 30 days, along with the opportunity for a personal hearing. However, the petitioner failed to provide any explanation or seek a hearing. The court emphasized that the petitioner's failure to provide a written explanation in response to the notice rendered the petition not maintainable. It underscored the importance of availing the opportunity to present a defense before challenging such notices in court.
Levy of GST on un-denatured Extra Neutral Alcohol supplied by the petitioner - The court observed that the show cause notice called upon the petitioner to submit a written explanation within 30 days, along with the opportunity for a personal hearing. However, the petitioner failed to provide any explanation or seek a hearing. The court emphasized that the petitioner's failure to provide a written explanation in response to the notice rendered the petition not maintainable. It underscored the importance of availing the opportunity to present a defense before challenging such notices in court.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
