Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
721 to 740 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Addition u/s 68 - ITAT confirmed the additions - The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, affirming the dismissal of the appeal. It concurred with the Tribunal's analysis, emphasizing that the assessment of income tax is a civil proceeding, wherein the test of preponderance of probability is applicable. The Court agreed that the explanation provided by the appellant regarding the gifts lacked sufficient evidence of genuineness. It noted the absence of any disclosed basis or relationship for the gifts, reinforcing the Tribunal's decision.
Addition u/s 68 - ITAT confirmed the additions - The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, affirming the dismissal of the appeal. It concurred with the Tribunal's analysis, emphasizing that the assessment of income tax is a civil proceeding, wherein the test of preponderance of probability is applicable. The Court agreed that the explanation provided by the appellant regarding the gifts lacked sufficient evidence of genuineness. It noted the absence of any disclosed basis or relationship for the gifts, reinforcing the Tribunal's decision.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.