Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Validity of order passed u/s 147 r.w.s.144B - availability of alternate statutory remedy - The High Court recognized that the arguments presented could be considered by examining the record. However, the Court refrained from conducting a fishing inquiry into the case under its writ jurisdiction due to factual complexities. - The High Court referred to Supreme Court decisions emphasizing the importance of exhausting statutory remedies before approaching the court under Article 226 of the Constitution. It held that when an alternate remedy is available, judicial prudence dictates refraining from exercising jurisdiction under constitutional provisions. Therefore, the High Court dismissed the writ petition, directing the petitioner to avail themselves of the statutory remedy of appeal.
Validity of order passed u/s 147 r.w.s.144B - availability of alternate statutory remedy - The High Court recognized that the arguments presented could be considered by examining the record. However, the Court refrained from conducting a fishing inquiry into the case under its writ jurisdiction due to factual complexities. - The High Court referred to Supreme Court decisions emphasizing the importance of exhausting statutory remedies before approaching the court under Article 226 of the Constitution. It held that when an alternate remedy is available, judicial prudence dictates refraining from exercising jurisdiction under constitutional provisions. Therefore, the High Court dismissed the writ petition, directing the petitioner to avail themselves of the statutory remedy of appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
