Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Specified regulatory authority income receives conditional tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return f...
Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-filing...
Input tax credit conditions remain constitutionally valid, with eligible recipient claims considered under GST circulars and retrospective filing dead...
Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1061 to 1080 of 96365 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Income taxable in India or not - Business of supplying reservoir simulation software and related services. - Receipts from Indian customers - Taxing the entire receipts of the assessee by applying the provisions of section 44BB - The Tribunal agreed with the assessee that the absence of a PE in India was critical and thus Section 44BB of the Act was not applicable. The tribunal found that the impugned receipts could not be taxed as either royalties or FTS under the India-Canada DTAA because they did not meet the necessary criteria. It upheld the beneficial provisions of the DTAA over domestic tax laws, stating that the assessee could choose the more favorable treaty benefits.
Income taxable in India or not - Business of supplying reservoir simulation software and related services. - Receipts from Indian customers - Taxing the entire receipts of the assessee by applying the provisions of section 44BB - The Tribunal agreed with the assessee that the absence of a PE in India was critical and thus Section 44BB of the Act was not applicable. The tribunal found that the impugned receipts could not be taxed as either royalties or FTS under the India-Canada DTAA because they did not meet the necessary criteria. It upheld the beneficial provisions of the DTAA over domestic tax laws, stating that the assessee could choose the more favorable treaty benefits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
