Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Loss on valuation of foreign exchange contract on M2M basis - Loss on forward contracts - speculative loss - The AO disallowed the addition on the grounds that the losses were notional and did not represent actual losses. However, the Appellate Tribunal found that the losses were incurred as part of the appellant's business activities to hedge against foreign exchange fluctuations. The Tribunal relied on established legal principles and previous judgments to support its decision. Therefore, the addition was deleted. - The AO treated the loss on forward contracts as speculative, disallowing it for set-off against profits. However, the Tribunal disagreed, stating that the contracts were entered into to safeguard business interests, not for speculative purposes.
Loss on valuation of foreign exchange contract on M2M basis - Loss on forward contracts - speculative loss - The AO disallowed the addition on the grounds that the losses were notional and did not represent actual losses. However, the Appellate Tribunal found that the losses were incurred as part of the appellant's business activities to hedge against foreign exchange fluctuations. The Tribunal relied on established legal principles and previous judgments to support its decision. Therefore, the addition was deleted. - The AO treated the loss on forward contracts as speculative, disallowing it for set-off against profits. However, the Tribunal disagreed, stating that the contracts were entered into to safeguard business interests, not for speculative purposes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
