Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Validity of reassessment proceedings - Reason to believe - The tribunal found that there was sufficient "reason to believe" that income had escaped assessment due to the admissions made during the survey. They referenced section 147 and noted that reassessment was justified based on the prima facie evidence available from the survey. - The tribunal concluded that the notices under section 148 were correctly issued, considering the sworn statements and other corroborating material from the survey, such as the admission of bogus purchases.
Validity of reassessment proceedings - Reason to believe - The tribunal found that there was sufficient "reason to believe" that income had escaped assessment due to the admissions made during the survey. They referenced section 147 and noted that reassessment was justified based on the prima facie evidence available from the survey. - The tribunal concluded that the notices under section 148 were correctly issued, considering the sworn statements and other corroborating material from the survey, such as the admission of bogus purchases.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.