Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Validity of reassessment proceedings - Reason to believe - The tribunal found that there was sufficient "reason to believe" that income had escaped assessment due to the admissions made during the survey. They referenced section 147 and noted that reassessment was justified based on the prima facie evidence available from the survey. - The tribunal concluded that the notices under section 148 were correctly issued, considering the sworn statements and other corroborating material from the survey, such as the admission of bogus purchases.
Validity of reassessment proceedings - Reason to believe - The tribunal found that there was sufficient "reason to believe" that income had escaped assessment due to the admissions made during the survey. They referenced section 147 and noted that reassessment was justified based on the prima facie evidence available from the survey. - The tribunal concluded that the notices under section 148 were correctly issued, considering the sworn statements and other corroborating material from the survey, such as the admission of bogus purchases.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
