Tax exemption for regulatory authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return filing...
Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
961 to 980 of 96333 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Re-export of even after the expiry of the warehousing period - Due to COVID-19 pandemic, the appellants were unable to proceed with their construction project and clear the goods for home consumption - In light of the circumstances, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the appellant's efforts to re-export the goods, the Tribunal found merit in the appellant's arguments. They emphasized the need for flexibility in such exceptional situations and cited the judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court regarding the extension of limitation period. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and directed the respondent to allow re-export of the goods within a specified period without insisting on payment of duty, interest, fine, or penalty.
Re-export of even after the expiry of the warehousing period - Due to COVID-19 pandemic, the appellants were unable to proceed with their construction project and clear the goods for home consumption - In light of the circumstances, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the appellant's efforts to re-export the goods, the Tribunal found merit in the appellant's arguments. They emphasized the need for flexibility in such exceptional situations and cited the judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court regarding the extension of limitation period. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and directed the respondent to allow re-export of the goods within a specified period without insisting on payment of duty, interest, fine, or penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
