Country of Origin Certificates and declared transaction value supported preferential customs exemption where authenticity and invoice prices remained ...
Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
381 to 400 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Professional misconduct by CA - The NFRA concluded that the actions of the firm and the engagement partner constituted professional misconduct. They failed to cooperate with the NFRA's investigation by not providing the requested information and by submitting false statements. The authority imposed a monetary penalty of fifty lakhs INR on the audit firm and thirty lakhs INR on the engagement partner. Furthermore, they were barred from being appointed as auditors or undertaking any audits related to financial statements or internal audit functions of any company or body corporate for two and ten years, respectively.
Professional misconduct by CA - The NFRA concluded that the actions of the firm and the engagement partner constituted professional misconduct. They failed to cooperate with the NFRA's investigation by not providing the requested information and by submitting false statements. The authority imposed a monetary penalty of fifty lakhs INR on the audit firm and thirty lakhs INR on the engagement partner. Furthermore, they were barred from being appointed as auditors or undertaking any audits related to financial statements or internal audit functions of any company or body corporate for two and ten years, respectively.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4814 
Join Channel 
