Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Threshold exemption excludes exempt services, while stamp-paper purchases avoid reverse charge; consequential service tax penalties were also set asid...
Employee conflict disclosures and investment restrictions expand with new recusal duties, post-employment limits, and compliance reporting requirement...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1721 to 1740 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rejection of claim filed by appellant - Appellant states that the Respondent / CD, did not perform its part of the contract from its inception and did not establish the letters of credit as contemplated - The Tribunal concurs with the Respondent that claims lacking supporting documents cannot be admitted. It upholds the Liquidator's decision to reject claims that lack substantiation and require adjudication by a competent civil court or arbitrator. Regarding the role of the Liquidator, the Tribunal agrees that her actions align with the IBC and Liquidation Regulations. She is obligated to verify claims based on available information and is not empowered to adjudicate disputes between parties.
Rejection of claim filed by appellant - Appellant states that the Respondent / CD, did not perform its part of the contract from its inception and did not establish the letters of credit as contemplated - The Tribunal concurs with the Respondent that claims lacking supporting documents cannot be admitted. It upholds the Liquidator's decision to reject claims that lack substantiation and require adjudication by a competent civil court or arbitrator. Regarding the role of the Liquidator, the Tribunal agrees that her actions align with the IBC and Liquidation Regulations. She is obligated to verify claims based on available information and is not empowered to adjudicate disputes between parties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
