Country of Origin Certificates and declared transaction value supported preferential customs exemption where authenticity and invoice prices remained ...
Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 96208 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Exemption from service tax - providing transportation of agricultural produce - De-novo order passed by the adjudicating authority during the pendency of the appeal - The Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to verify whether the transportation services were indeed for agricultural produce, potentially making them exempt from service tax. It remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for further examination and consideration of the appellant's submissions. - Regarding the De Novo Adjudication Process: The Tribunal deemed the de novo order passed by the adjudicating authority during the pendency of the appeal before the Tribunal as a violation of principles of natural justice.
Exemption from service tax - providing transportation of agricultural produce - De-novo order passed by the adjudicating authority during the pendency of the appeal - The Tribunal directed the adjudicating authority to verify whether the transportation services were indeed for agricultural produce, potentially making them exempt from service tax. It remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority for further examination and consideration of the appellant's submissions. - Regarding the De Novo Adjudication Process: The Tribunal deemed the de novo order passed by the adjudicating authority during the pendency of the appeal before the Tribunal as a violation of principles of natural justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.