Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
521 to 540 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of service tax - water charges paid - transfer of right to use the water by the Government to the appellant - Deemed sale - Since the agreement was for water supply, not services, the Tribunal found that service tax was not applicable to the water charges paid. - Considering the agreement's pre-2016 date, the Tribunal held that any services provided should be governed by pre-2016 provisions, exempting the appellant from tax liability. - Further, the Tribunal agreed with the appellant's argument that the water supply constituted the supply of goods, not services, aligning with the Finance Act's definition.
Levy of service tax - water charges paid - transfer of right to use the water by the Government to the appellant - Deemed sale - Since the agreement was for water supply, not services, the Tribunal found that service tax was not applicable to the water charges paid. - Considering the agreement's pre-2016 date, the Tribunal held that any services provided should be governed by pre-2016 provisions, exempting the appellant from tax liability. - Further, the Tribunal agreed with the appellant's argument that the water supply constituted the supply of goods, not services, aligning with the Finance Act's definition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.