Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4807
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 96140 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy of service tax - water charges paid - transfer of right to use the water by the Government to the appellant - Deemed sale - Since the agreement was for water supply, not services, the Tribunal found that service tax was not applicable to the water charges paid. - Considering the agreement's pre-2016 date, the Tribunal held that any services provided should be governed by pre-2016 provisions, exempting the appellant from tax liability. - Further, the Tribunal agreed with the appellant's argument that the water supply constituted the supply of goods, not services, aligning with the Finance Act's definition.
Levy of service tax - water charges paid - transfer of right to use the water by the Government to the appellant - Deemed sale - Since the agreement was for water supply, not services, the Tribunal found that service tax was not applicable to the water charges paid. - Considering the agreement's pre-2016 date, the Tribunal held that any services provided should be governed by pre-2016 provisions, exempting the appellant from tax liability. - Further, the Tribunal agreed with the appellant's argument that the water supply constituted the supply of goods, not services, aligning with the Finance Act's definition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.