Charitable registration turns on predominant purpose and genuine activities, while incidental fees and related-party rent require supporting adverse m...
MAT book-profit adjustments exclude disallowances for exempt-income expenditure and demerger expenditure unless expressly listed under the statutory c...
Omitted specified domestic transaction provision invalidates related-party expenditure transfer-pricing references and assessments based on consequent...
Preventive suspension requires an immediate continuing threat and cannot become indefinite without inquiry, fresh evidence, or proportionate safeguard...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Condonation of delay in filing an appeal before the appellate authority - The High Court disagreed with the State's contention regarding the implied exclusion of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. It emphasized that in the absence of a specific exclusion of Section 5, it would be improper to read an implied exclusion. - The Court set aside the order of the appellate authority refusing to condone the delay under Section 107 of the WBGST Act, 2017. It held that the appellate authority had failed to exercise jurisdiction in refusing to entertain the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Consequently, the delay in preferring the appeal was condoned, and the appeal was restored to its original file and number.
Condonation of delay in filing an appeal before the appellate authority - The High Court disagreed with the State's contention regarding the implied exclusion of Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. It emphasized that in the absence of a specific exclusion of Section 5, it would be improper to read an implied exclusion. - The Court set aside the order of the appellate authority refusing to condone the delay under Section 107 of the WBGST Act, 2017. It held that the appellate authority had failed to exercise jurisdiction in refusing to entertain the application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. Consequently, the delay in preferring the appeal was condoned, and the appeal was restored to its original file and number.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
