Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Refund claim of encashed amount by the revenue - Direction to withdraw recovery proceedings by issuing a demand draft equivalent to the Bank Guarantee - circular dated 18.03.2020 - The Court notes the submissions of both parties regarding the inability to prefer an appeal due to the non-constitution of the appellate tribunal. - Referring to a circular, the Court acknowledges the issue of pending appellate processes due to the absence of the appellate tribunal. The Court directs the respondent to refund the encashed amount to the petitioner within one month from the date of the judgment. It further directs the petitioner to furnish a fresh bank guarantee within one week from the date of refund, valid for one year.
Refund claim of encashed amount by the revenue - Direction to withdraw recovery proceedings by issuing a demand draft equivalent to the Bank Guarantee - circular dated 18.03.2020 - The Court notes the submissions of both parties regarding the inability to prefer an appeal due to the non-constitution of the appellate tribunal. - Referring to a circular, the Court acknowledges the issue of pending appellate processes due to the absence of the appellate tribunal. The Court directs the respondent to refund the encashed amount to the petitioner within one month from the date of the judgment. It further directs the petitioner to furnish a fresh bank guarantee within one week from the date of refund, valid for one year.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
