Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of assessment order - classification of oil coolers as heat exchangers - The High court observed that the petitioner's main grievance was the disregard of the Chartered Engineer's certificate. However, the court determined that this contention could be raised in appellate proceedings, as the overall facts and circumstances did not justify interference under Article 226 of the Constitution. - The court disposed of the writ petition by permitting the petitioner to file a statutory appeal before the appellate authority within three weeks.
Validity of assessment order - classification of oil coolers as heat exchangers - The High court observed that the petitioner's main grievance was the disregard of the Chartered Engineer's certificate. However, the court determined that this contention could be raised in appellate proceedings, as the overall facts and circumstances did not justify interference under Article 226 of the Constitution. - The court disposed of the writ petition by permitting the petitioner to file a statutory appeal before the appellate authority within three weeks.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.