Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Reopening of assessment under old regime - scope of new regime - scope of TOLA - In this detailed judgement, the Court found that the notice issued under Section 148 was invalid due to its reliance on repealed provisions. The High Court noted that subsequent legislation and court decisions had overtaken the statutes on which the original notices were based, rendering them ineffective. The High Court pointed out procedural flaws in the reassessment process, including the lack of proper approval from designated authorities, which was mandated by the law. The court emphasized the importance of following due process to uphold the integrity of tax reassessment procedures.
Reopening of assessment under old regime - scope of new regime - scope of TOLA - In this detailed judgement, the Court found that the notice issued under Section 148 was invalid due to its reliance on repealed provisions. The High Court noted that subsequent legislation and court decisions had overtaken the statutes on which the original notices were based, rendering them ineffective. The High Court pointed out procedural flaws in the reassessment process, including the lack of proper approval from designated authorities, which was mandated by the law. The court emphasized the importance of following due process to uphold the integrity of tax reassessment procedures.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
