Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment under old regime - scope of new regime - scope of TOLA - In this detailed judgement, the Court found that the notice issued under Section 148 was invalid due to its reliance on repealed provisions. The High Court noted that subsequent legislation and court decisions had overtaken the statutes on which the original notices were based, rendering them ineffective. The High Court pointed out procedural flaws in the reassessment process, including the lack of proper approval from designated authorities, which was mandated by the law. The court emphasized the importance of following due process to uphold the integrity of tax reassessment procedures.
Reopening of assessment under old regime - scope of new regime - scope of TOLA - In this detailed judgement, the Court found that the notice issued under Section 148 was invalid due to its reliance on repealed provisions. The High Court noted that subsequent legislation and court decisions had overtaken the statutes on which the original notices were based, rendering them ineffective. The High Court pointed out procedural flaws in the reassessment process, including the lack of proper approval from designated authorities, which was mandated by the law. The court emphasized the importance of following due process to uphold the integrity of tax reassessment procedures.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.