Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 against non-existing entity - scheme of the amalgamation and arrangement approved - The High Court acknowledges the petitioner's argument regarding the issuance of notices and assessment orders to a non-existent entity. It finds that the reassessment orders and notices cannot be sustained due to this fundamental flaw. As a result, the court quashes and sets aside the reassessment orders and notices. - The court observes that the reassessment orders failed to consider the legal consequences of the approved scheme of amalgamation and arrangement. - Consequently, the court quashed and set aside the reassessment orders and notices.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 against non-existing entity - scheme of the amalgamation and arrangement approved - The High Court acknowledges the petitioner's argument regarding the issuance of notices and assessment orders to a non-existent entity. It finds that the reassessment orders and notices cannot be sustained due to this fundamental flaw. As a result, the court quashes and sets aside the reassessment orders and notices. - The court observes that the reassessment orders failed to consider the legal consequences of the approved scheme of amalgamation and arrangement. - Consequently, the court quashed and set aside the reassessment orders and notices.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.