Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 against non-existing entity - scheme of the amalgamation and arrangement approved - The High Court acknowledges the petitioner's argument regarding the issuance of notices and assessment orders to a non-existent entity. It finds that the reassessment orders and notices cannot be sustained due to this fundamental flaw. As a result, the court quashes and sets aside the reassessment orders and notices. - The court observes that the reassessment orders failed to consider the legal consequences of the approved scheme of amalgamation and arrangement. - Consequently, the court quashed and set aside the reassessment orders and notices.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 against non-existing entity - scheme of the amalgamation and arrangement approved - The High Court acknowledges the petitioner's argument regarding the issuance of notices and assessment orders to a non-existent entity. It finds that the reassessment orders and notices cannot be sustained due to this fundamental flaw. As a result, the court quashes and sets aside the reassessment orders and notices. - The court observes that the reassessment orders failed to consider the legal consequences of the approved scheme of amalgamation and arrangement. - Consequently, the court quashed and set aside the reassessment orders and notices.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.