Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 against non-existing entity - scheme of the amalgamation and arrangement approved - The High Court acknowledges the petitioner's argument regarding the issuance of notices and assessment orders to a non-existent entity. It finds that the reassessment orders and notices cannot be sustained due to this fundamental flaw. As a result, the court quashes and sets aside the reassessment orders and notices. - The court observes that the reassessment orders failed to consider the legal consequences of the approved scheme of amalgamation and arrangement. - Consequently, the court quashed and set aside the reassessment orders and notices.
Reopening of assessment u/s 147 against non-existing entity - scheme of the amalgamation and arrangement approved - The High Court acknowledges the petitioner's argument regarding the issuance of notices and assessment orders to a non-existent entity. It finds that the reassessment orders and notices cannot be sustained due to this fundamental flaw. As a result, the court quashes and sets aside the reassessment orders and notices. - The court observes that the reassessment orders failed to consider the legal consequences of the approved scheme of amalgamation and arrangement. - Consequently, the court quashed and set aside the reassessment orders and notices.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.