Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1381 to 1400 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Reopening of assessment - Reasons to believe - ACIT jurisdiction to issue the notice u/s 148 - The Tribunal concluded that the reasons for reopening were based on credible information from the Investigation Wing, providing sufficient grounds for prima facie belief of income escapement. The approval from the PCIT, although brief, was considered valid as there was no evidence indicating lack of proper application of mind. - The Tribunal rejected the appellant's argument about the notice being issued after the prescribed time limit, noting that the acknowledgment from the postal authorities confirmed receipt within the deadline. Objections regarding reasons for issuing notices under section 143(2) and inadequate time for compliance were deemed meritless.
Reopening of assessment - Reasons to believe - ACIT jurisdiction to issue the notice u/s 148 - The Tribunal concluded that the reasons for reopening were based on credible information from the Investigation Wing, providing sufficient grounds for prima facie belief of income escapement. The approval from the PCIT, although brief, was considered valid as there was no evidence indicating lack of proper application of mind. - The Tribunal rejected the appellant's argument about the notice being issued after the prescribed time limit, noting that the acknowledgment from the postal authorities confirmed receipt within the deadline. Objections regarding reasons for issuing notices under section 143(2) and inadequate time for compliance were deemed meritless.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
