Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1381 to 1400 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
LTCG - denial of a claim of exemption u/s 54 - new residential house property was purchased only after the lapse of two years from the sale of original property - The Tribunal found that the assessee had deposited the entire sale consideration in the Capital Gains Scheme Account before the due date for filing the return of income. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the assessee complied with the provisions of Section 54(2) of the Act. - Regarding the purchase of the new residential property, the Tribunal observed that the property bought by the assessee was an under-construction flat, for which the occupation certificate was awaited. As a result, they directed further examination to determine if the extended period of three years for construction as provided under Section 54 of the Act applied in this case.
LTCG - denial of a claim of exemption u/s 54 - new residential house property was purchased only after the lapse of two years from the sale of original property - The Tribunal found that the assessee had deposited the entire sale consideration in the Capital Gains Scheme Account before the due date for filing the return of income. Consequently, the Tribunal held that the assessee complied with the provisions of Section 54(2) of the Act. - Regarding the purchase of the new residential property, the Tribunal observed that the property bought by the assessee was an under-construction flat, for which the occupation certificate was awaited. As a result, they directed further examination to determine if the extended period of three years for construction as provided under Section 54 of the Act applied in this case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.