Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Cancellation of MEIS scrips - Re- classification of the goods - Export of “Lamda Cyhalothrin Technical” - The Tribunal upheld the appellant's classification, emphasizing that only DGFT had the authority to cancel MEIS scrips. The Customs Department lacked the power to invalidate exports based on alleged misclassification. The Tribunal reiterated that customs authorities cannot invalidate exports or cancel MEIS scrips without DGFT's action. They emphasized the need for DGFT to follow due procedure under the FTDR Act and FTP for such cancellations. The Tribunal affirmed the separation of roles between customs and licensing authorities. Customs authorities should not interfere with licensing policies or reclassify goods after valid licenses are issued.
Cancellation of MEIS scrips - Re- classification of the goods - Export of “Lamda Cyhalothrin Technical” - The Tribunal upheld the appellant's classification, emphasizing that only DGFT had the authority to cancel MEIS scrips. The Customs Department lacked the power to invalidate exports based on alleged misclassification. The Tribunal reiterated that customs authorities cannot invalidate exports or cancel MEIS scrips without DGFT's action. They emphasized the need for DGFT to follow due procedure under the FTDR Act and FTP for such cancellations. The Tribunal affirmed the separation of roles between customs and licensing authorities. Customs authorities should not interfere with licensing policies or reclassify goods after valid licenses are issued.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
