Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Rejection of refund claim - GTA Service - time limitation - The tribunal reaffirmed the previous tribunal orders that transportation of coal within and outside mining areas does not constitute GTA service due to the absence of consignment notes. Therefore, the appellant is not liable to pay service tax under RCM for GTA service. - The tribunal found that the refund claim was filed within the prescribed time limit, as it was based on the final order of the tribunal dated 13.08.2014, and thus, was not barred by time.
Rejection of refund claim - GTA Service - time limitation - The tribunal reaffirmed the previous tribunal orders that transportation of coal within and outside mining areas does not constitute GTA service due to the absence of consignment notes. Therefore, the appellant is not liable to pay service tax under RCM for GTA service. - The tribunal found that the refund claim was filed within the prescribed time limit, as it was based on the final order of the tribunal dated 13.08.2014, and thus, was not barred by time.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.