Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Re-quantification of interest (on the refund of the pre-deposit) payment to the appellant - relevant time - The Tribunal focused on the applicable legal provisions, specifically Section 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as amended. It noted that the pre-deposit was made before the amendment of this section, and therefore, the provisions applicable at the time of the deposit govern the interest calculations. The Tribunal upheld the view that interest is payable only after three months from the date of the appellate order, as per the unamended Section 35FF.
Re-quantification of interest (on the refund of the pre-deposit) payment to the appellant - relevant time - The Tribunal focused on the applicable legal provisions, specifically Section 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, as amended. It noted that the pre-deposit was made before the amendment of this section, and therefore, the provisions applicable at the time of the deposit govern the interest calculations. The Tribunal upheld the view that interest is payable only after three months from the date of the appellate order, as per the unamended Section 35FF.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.